When Afghan forces allied with the United States captured Mr. Haroon in 2007, he was thought-about a commander of the Hezb-i-Islami militia, which fought alongside the Taliban and Al Qaeda in opposition to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan. Then, in 2016, the militia made peace with the federal government of President Ashraf Ghani, a U.S. ally, casting doubt on whether or not Mr. Haroon might legally be held as a part of an enemy drive at Guantánamo Bay. By final 12 months, the Ghani authorities had filed a petition in U.S. court searching for his return.
Reporting From Afghanistan
But by the point a federal decide, Amit P. Mehta of the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C., dominated that his persevering with detention was illegal, the Taliban had ousted the Ghani authorities, leaving the Biden administration with the conundrum of get Mr. Haroon residence.
In most situations, the legislation requires the secretary of protection to certify to Congress his satisfaction with the safety preparations, which generally require monitoring of the previous detainee, limiting his journey and sharing intelligence with U.S. counterterrorism officers. But when a courtroom orders a launch, as in Mr. Haroon’s case, or a detainee completes a conflict crimes sentence, no such certification is required. Instead, the switch was authorized by Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, who despatched discover to Congress of the pending launch final month.
It was not recognized if any safety assurances had been organized.
On May 4, the Justice Department filed notice in Mr. Haroon’s federal court case of the potential switch. “The U.S. government is pursuing a strategy for outreach and meeting logistical requirements to effect petitioner’s repatriation to Afghanistan,” it mentioned.