Connect with us


Liz Cheney’s Non-Concession Speech – POLITICO

Some proclaim the ability of the trigger they fought for. Ted Kennedy memorably ended his 1980 conference speech — a prolonged recitation of the liberal imaginative and prescient — by saying: “For me, a few hours ago, this campaign came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die.”

A number of provide humor. When Dick Tuck misplaced a California state Senate race in 1966, he proclaimed: “the people have spoken — the bastards.” (Rep. Mo Udall borrowed the road in 1976.)

Some grudgingly acknowledge the loss with greater than a contact of anger. Stacey Abrams in 2018 condemned the “rotten and rigged” election system, and stated flatly: “So let’s be clear, this is not a speech of concession because concession means to acknowledge an action is right, true or proper. As a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede that.”

And every so often, a contact of barely suppressed resentment emerges, most famously as when Richard Nixon, after dropping a 1962 governor’s race, advised the press corps “you won’t have Nixon to kick around anymore.”

But not often will we see the sort of “concession” speech that Cheney delivered tonight. (She had loads of time to organize her remarks, since polls have confirmed her dropping badly for months.) It was, as she had promised, a “road map” to her future plans for denying Donald Trump a return to the White House.

The solely remotely parallel concession speech that involves thoughts is when Sen. Joe Lieberman misplaced the 2006 Democratic major to Ned Lamont (now the Connecticut governor), who rallied liberals in opposition to Lieberman for, amongst different issues, his vote for the Iraq War.

Far from conceding, Lieberman stated that “As I see it, in this campaign we just finished the first half and the Lamont team is ahead. In the second half our team — Team Connecticut — is going to surge forward to victory.” Deploring the dominance of partisan politics, he stated: “…Tomorrow we launch a new campaign to unite the people of Connecticut — Team Connecticut — Democrats, Republicans and independents so we can go forward together to solve our most serious problems together.”

The pitch labored. That November, Lieberman defeated Lamont by 10 factors. Less than two years later, he was on the Republican conference endorsing John McCain.

Cheney, after all, is after a lot larger recreation than trying to retain her seat. (That’s the purpose of Alaska GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who has the benefit of a brand new major course of that advantages appeals to the middle.) With your entire nationwide political equipment centered on the Wyoming major, Cheney made her intentions starkly clear.

Standing in “God’s country” — the hills of Jackson (a location chosen with the assistance of reports producer James Godson, who has helped form the telegenic January 6 hearings) — Cheney started by saying “our work is far from over.”

“Two years ago, I won this primary with 73 percent of the vote. I could easily have done the same again. The path was clear.” But that might have meant following Donald Trump’s lies in regards to the election, she stated, and “That is a path I would not take.”

Then she “turned the page.”

“This primary election is over,” she flatly stated, “But now the real work begins.”

That work, she argued, is rooted within the combat in opposition to “the conspiracy and the lies” in regards to the 2020 elections. She pointed (if not by title) to Republican candidates for governor, secretary of state and different places of work, who baselessly argue that the election was stolen, with some even having promised to decertify the final election. More pointedly, she known as out Trump for spreading lies which can be more likely to incite violence, and for revealing the names of the FBI brokers who executed the warrant to go looking his places of work in Florida. If violence occurs, she stated in impact, it will likely be on Donald Trump’s arms.

And, after a prolonged flip into Civil War historical past — maybe to remind her viewers of how excessive the stakes are for the republic, with a battle fought by the primary Republican president — she repeated what will likely be seen as a transparent indication of future political engagement: “I will do whatever it takes” to disclaim Trump a return to the Oval Office.

There will likely be infinite hypothesis about what which may imply. A 2024 major run in opposition to Trump (which at first and even second blush looks as if a supremely futile gesture)? An unbiased run? (She did handle to notice that “Abraham Lincoln was defeated in elections for the Senate and House before he won the most important election of all.”)

There is, nevertheless, little doubt that anybody labeling this all a “concession speech” has a extreme listening to drawback.

Source link