Connect with us

Politics

Likening Nikki Haley to Clinton, Ads From Pro-DeSantis Super PAC Fall Short


In Republican politics, being likened to a outstanding Democrat like Hillary Clinton could be among the many highest of insults.

Some G.O.P. presidential hopefuls and their allies are seizing on that comparability to denounce Nikki Haley, the previous governor of South Carolina who has gained momentum within the major race. During the Republican debate in Alabama on Wednesday, for instance, the entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy criticized Ms. Haley for giving “foreign multinational speeches like Hillary Clinton.”

In explicit, although, supporters of Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida have leveraged that line of assault, together with in commercials by a pro-DeSantis super PAC, Fight Right. But the advertisements making an attempt to tie Ms. Haley to Mrs. Clinton, the previous secretary of state, make claims which can be deceptive.

Here’s a fact-check of a few of these claims.

WHAT WAS SAID

“We know her as Crooked Hillary, but to Nikki Haley, she’s her role model, the reason she ran for office.”
— Fight Right in an advertisement

This is deceptive. Ms. Haley has mentioned on a number of events through the years — together with in a 2012 interview with The New York Times — that Mrs. Clinton impressed her to run for workplace. Specifically, a speech by Mrs. Clinton through which she mentioned the significance of ladies in public workplace was a motivating power. But Ms. Haley has additionally emphasised their coverage variations, which the advert omits, and spoke out towards the prospect of Mrs. Clinton profitable the presidency in 2016.

The advert at one level reveals Ms. Haley saying, “I often say that the reason I got into politics was because of Hillary Clinton.”

But the advert omits criticism of Mrs. Clinton that Ms. Haley included in that comment, which is from an interview in July 2020 with the Women & Politics Institute at American University.

Asked to share her ideas on the ladies who ran for president within the 2020 Democratic major and perceptions round their electability, Ms. Haley replied: “I think that we had some strong women that ran for office. And I respect any man or woman that puts their hat in the ring. I really respect all the women that put their hat in the ring.”

She continued, “You know, I often say that the reason I got into politics — believe it or not, I don’t agree with anything that she has to say — but it was because of Hillary Clinton.”

Ms. Haley then referred to a speech Mrs. Clinton gave in 2003 to Furman University, in Greenville, S.C.

“She was the one that said for all the reasons people tell you you shouldn’t run, those are the reasons you should. And I walked out of there and decided to run for the statehouse,” Ms. Haley mentioned.

Ms. Haley was elected to South Carolina’s House of Representatives in 2004.

WHAT WAS SAID

“Haley raised taxes like Hillary.”
Fight Right in an ad

This is deceptive. The advert cites a bill that South Carolina lawmakers handed in 2006 that raised the state gross sales tax by one share level. But that measure additionally exempted owner-occupants from paying property taxes for colleges, amongst different provisions. Ms. Haley was a co-sponsor of the legislation.

The laws was described by consultants as a “tax swap” and an evaluation on the time projected that almost all owners would have an overall decreased tax burden.

“This was a tax swap, not a tax increase,” Jared Walczak, the vp of state tasks on the Tax Foundation, a right-leaning suppose tank. “It’s fair to question whether the swap was a good one, particularly the policy of exempting homeowners from school property taxes, while leaving them on commercial property, including rental properties. But it is inaccurate to characterize the legislation a tax hike.”

Tax overhaul measures usually embody rising revenues in a single space to pay down reductions elsewhere, Mr. Walczak mentioned in an electronic mail. “If the net effect is revenue neutral or a reduction in collections, such policies are not conventionally viewed as raising taxes.”

He added, “Such a definition would allow significant tax cuts, including the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act adopted during the Trump administration, to be characterized as raising taxes.”

The Fight Right advert additionally cites an article by Fox Business in the fall about Ms. Haley and South Carolina’s fuel tax — the topic of misleading claims by one other pro-DeSantis tremendous PAC. Ms. Haley didn’t improve the fuel tax as governor. She resisted calls to elevate the fuel tax as a stand-alone measure, however proposed elevating the tax provided that the state additionally decreased the revenue tax price to 5 %, from 7 %, and made modifications to the state’s Transportation Department.

Fight Right didn’t reply to requests for remark.

WHAT WAS SAID

Nikki Haley “backs open borders like Hillary.”
— Fight Right in an ad

This is fake. There isn’t any proof that Ms. Haley helps “open borders.” In truth, she has repeatedly called for the United States to shut the southern border.

In April, Ms. Haley posted a video on social media whereas visiting the southern border and criticized chain-link fencing as inadequate.

“We need to finish what we started, whether it’s this or this — we need something,” Ms. Haley mentioned, motioning to a portion of the wall that she mentioned had been constructed beneath the Trump administration in addition to a tall fencing system. “But a chain-link fence, that’s not going to stop anybody and that’s why we see so many illegal immigrants coming across.”

During her marketing campaign for the Republican nomination, Ms. Haley has proposed transforming the immigration system to legally admit folks to the nation primarily based on advantage, reasonably than quotas.

“Now, when it comes to legal immigration, it’s a broken system — it shouldn’t take someone 10 years to become a citizen,” Ms. Haley said last month in New Hampshire. “But what we need to do is reform it.”

“So for too long, Republican and Democrat presidents dealt with immigration based on a quota,” she mentioned. “We’ll take X number this year, we’ll take X number next year. The debate is on the number. It’s the wrong way to look at it. We need to do it based on merit. We need to go to our industries and say what do you need that you don’t have? So think agriculture, think tourism, think tech. We want the talent that’s going to make us better.”

Curious in regards to the accuracy of a declare? Email factcheck@nytimes.com.





Source link

Trending